http://www.luminous-landscape.…5_first_impressions.shtml
Offenbar hat Sony es geschafft, mein Lieblingsthema (nämlich den Grenznutzen hoher Auflösungen) mit der SLT A 77, der NEX 7 und der SLT A 65 auch im Wechselobjektivbereich-Bereich zu etablieren. Auch hier kann man nun also darüber streiten, ob es sinnvoll ist, eine Bildqualität bei 100% zu beurteilen, ob es sinnvoll ist, einen 24 MP-Sensor zu enrtwickeln und wenn ja, wofür.
Ich zitiere dazu aus dem oben im ganzen verlinkten Artikel:
ZitatAlles anzeigenLooking at an image from a high resolution camera on-screen at 100% is like walking up to your large screen TV and looking at the picture at the closest distance that your eyes can focus. What do you see? RGB dots, right? Now go back to your favourite arm chair and what do you see? The Sunday afternoon football game.
I rest my case.
Back in the days of 3 Megapixel and 6 Megapixel cameras looking at an image at 100% on screen bore a relationship to what we might see on an 8X10" or a 11X17" print. Today, a 24 Megapixel file can make an excellent 24X36" print. How many prints that big do you ever make? Indeed, how many worthwhile photographs do you ever take at anything over ISO 1600?
But still, we continue to insist on looking at images at 100% on-screen. It does tell us things about the image quality, but just not things that are terribly relevant to most people's real-world needs.